<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arizona Rocks Tours &#187; Environmental</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arizonarockstours.com/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arizonarockstours.com</link>
	<description>Arizona Rocks Like You&#039;ve Never Seen Its Rocks Before</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Condor Breeding Season Update</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2011/03/30/california-condor-breeding-season-update/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2011/03/30/california-condor-breeding-season-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california condor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condor update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon condors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild condors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=1575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An update from Ms. Marker Marshall, Grand Canyon Interpretive Ranger. I will do my best to forward updates from Marker. She&#8217;s great!!</p> <p>_______________________________________________________________</p> <p>Hello Condor Enthusiasts— This is a long Breeding Season update.</p> <p>Population numbers from the US Fish &#38; Wildlife Service, as of February 28, 2011:</p> <p>World Total:     369  (This is down one since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/19953384@N00/4246667094"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 0px 7px; border: 0pt none;" title="California Condor" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2532/4246667094_96b386072e_m.jpg" border="0" alt="4246667094 96b386072e m California Condor Breeding Season Update" hspace="5" width="206" height="137" /></a>An update from Ms. Marker Marshall, Grand Canyon Interpretive Ranger. I will do my best to forward updates from Marker. She&#8217;s great!!</p>
<p>_______________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Hello Condor Enthusiasts— This is a long Breeding Season update.</p>
<p><em>Population numbers from the </em><em>US</em><em> Fish &amp; Wildlife Service, as of February 28, 2011:</em></p>
<p>World Total:     369  (This is down one since December 31; a breeding-age female condor from Baja California, Mexico, who was being treated for lead poisoning at the L.A. Zoo, died there on January 7.)<span id="more-1575"></span></p>
<p>Captive Population (including birds temporarily in captivity):  179</p>
<p>Wild Population:                     190</p>
<p>California:                                   97</p>
<p>Baja California, Mexico:        20</p>
<p>Arizona/Utah:  74 (counting #122 in Phoenix for lead treatment) 73 now, following one mortality in March (see “Sad News” below)</p>
<p><strong>As of </strong><strong>February 28, 32</strong><strong> eggs had been laid this year in the four captive breeding facilities</strong> (the L.A. Zoo, the San Diego  Wild Animal Park, the Oregon Zoo in Portland and The Peregrine Fund’s World Center for Birds of Prey in Boise, Idaho).  <strong>Five eggs had been confirmed in the wild in </strong><strong>California</strong>: 2 each in southern California and Pinnacles  National Monument, and another in the Big Sur area.</p>
<p><strong><em>Arizona</em></strong><strong><em> news (from conversations with Peregrine Fund staff Chris Parish on March 3 and Eddie Feltes this morning):</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Male 122/tag 22, who was expected to nest again this year in the Tapeats Creek area with female 210/10, was transferred to Phoenix on January 19 to be treated for lead poisoning </strong>by Dr. Kathy Orr at Liberty Wildlife. <strong> He has recovered nicely, and will be returned to Vermilion Cliffs tomorrow, and re-released in another week. </strong>#210 has not re-mated, and there is just a slim chance that this pair could still produce an egg this year, though it’s unlikely.</p>
<p><strong>As of March 3, just one egg was thought to exist thus far in </strong><strong>Arizona</strong><strong>, and it’s still the only visually confirmed egg although others are now suspected.  This nest is a repeat performance by the trio of condors 241F/41, 193M/93, &amp; 243M/43 on the east Kaibab plateau. </strong>Their nest failed last year, and hopes are not high that they will succeed this year unless they settle out into a single pair.  But for now, all three birds are taking turns incubating and all appears to be going well.</p>
<p><strong>Sad news</strong> from Eddie Feltes today:  <strong>Six-year-old female 366/C6 was recently found dead of unknown causes (lead was ruled out) </strong>on the Kaibab National Forest north of the park. <strong> She and male 203/03 are suspected to have had an egg in a nest cave in the Deer Creek area of </strong><strong>Grand   Canyon</strong><strong> </strong><strong>National Park</strong><strong>. </strong> 203 is still spending a lot of time in the cave, but cannot possibly succeed in incubating alone.</p>
<p>Another recent disappointment: <strong> Eight-year-old male 299/99 recently showed up at the release site in poor condition and tested high for blood lead level; he was held and is undergoing chelation. </strong> This is all too common an occurrence among condors in the wild, but is especially disappointing in this case because<strong> he and female 343/A3 appeared to be on the verge of nesting in </strong><strong>Zion</strong><strong> </strong><strong>National   Park</strong><strong> in </strong><strong>Utah</strong><strong>! </strong> They’d been seen regularly courting and mating in the vicinity of Angel’s Landing, and had shown interest in 3 different potential nest caves in that area.  #343 is being held at Vermilion Cliffs too, to avoid breaking up the pair.  But their odds of breeding this year are now much reduced.</p>
<p><strong><em>Other suspected eggs:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Female 133/33 and male 187/87 seem to have produced an egg in a new cave, in the Pipe Springs drainage, just west of Yaki Point.  This cave is visible from a spot on the rim just east of Mather Point!  (Expect a call for nest watch volunteers sometime soon.)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Female 314/-4 and Male 287/-7 are suspected to have laid in an unidentified cave in the Redwall limestone in the vicinity of the Great Thumb </strong>(well to the west of the developed part of the South Rim, but within Grand Canyon  National Park).  This pair courted last year too, but never showed signs of an egg.</p>
<p><strong>Female 253/53 and male 223/3 seem to have laid their 5<sup>th</sup> egg in four years in the river corridor within </strong><strong>Marble</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Canyon</strong><strong>, in the Soap Creek drainage </strong>within Grand Canyon  National Park.  It is suspected that at least some of their previous failures may have been due to ravens raiding their nest when the incubating parent was taking a brief break.  This year they have chosen a new nest cave that seems to have less raven activity around it, so perhaps this will be their year!</p>
<p>Female 280/80 and male 234/4 have been seen frequently courting and mating around Plateau Point.   Still no sign of a nest, but they have laid in the past below Buddha Temple and it is expected they might lay in that vicinity again sometime soon.</p>
<p>Most Eligible Bachelorette, female 316/16, an eight-year-old female who has still never mated, has been spending time with five-year-old male 423/E3, but there has been no sign of courtship, and he is on the young side for breeding.  In the meanwhile, Most Eligible Bachelor, sixteen-year-old 123/23, who has fathered several chicks but lost mate 127 to lead poisoning last winter, has shown no signs of courting anyone this breeding season.</p>
<p><strong>Last year’s Vermilion Cliffs fledgling, #558 (soon to receive tag 5) is doing well.</strong> He or she has fed about a dozen times on calf carcasses at the release site, but is still being fed by parents male 114/tagless and female 126/26.  That pair has been observed courting and mating, and briefly showed signs of possibly having an egg in their usual nest cave.  But with 558 still being fed and still showing up in that nest cave, it is unlikely that they will breed successfully this year.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the proffering of calf carcasses (still-born dairy calves and unwanted male dairy calves from several organic dairies) has changed a bit recently.  Carcasses are still put out every three days at the Vermilion Cliffs release site, but instead of scattering them about artfully, they are placed in the release pen just as when trapping is being done.  Coyotes have discovered Vermilion Cliffs as a source of food, and had been dragging off the carcasses during the night before the condors even saw them.  The prevalence of coyotes meant danger to the condors, as well as a waste of good meat, but this seems to be solving the problem for now.</p>
<p><strong>Three male condors have not been seen since December or early January</strong>:  420/20, 459/59 (the 2007 Vermilion Cliffs chick), and 331/31.  <strong>They haven’t been written off yet, but could at some point be listed as missing and presumed dead.</strong></p>
<p>I e-mailed <strong><em>Kathy Sullivan of Arizona Game &amp; Fish Department</em></strong> about her continuing efforts to eliminate the use of lead bullets on the North  Kaibab in Arizona.  She responded with the following on March 4, 2011:</p>
<p><strong><em>The free ammo program and gut pile raffle were both implemented again last fall. We had 87% voluntary participation from Kaibab hunters in 2010. We’ve had 80-90% participation for the past four years now! </em></strong></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>We’re also continuing our outreach efforts full speed.  I worked a non-lead ammo booth at the Sportsman’s Expo in PHX last weekend (contacting just under 1,000 hunters and shooters).  I will also be staffing a non-lead ammo shooting booth at Game and Fish’s Outdoor Expo in PHX the last weekend of this month (also expected to reach ~ 1,000 people). </em><strong><em>Utah</em></strong><strong><em> is also working on voluntary lead reduction efforts.  UT Department of Wildlife implemented a non-lead ammo rebate coupon program last fall: if hunters bought non-lead ammo and sent the UPC symbol to UTDWR, they were mailed a $25 rebate check. </em></strong><em> Results will be presented next month.</em></p>
<p>Until I have more news….</p>
<p>Marker</p>
<p>Ms. Marker Marshall<br />
Park Ranger&#8211;Interpretation<br />
Grand Canyon National Park</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2011/03/30/california-condor-breeding-season-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmentalists lose court battle</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/26/environmentalists-lose-court-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/26/environmentalists-lose-court-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado river management plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national park service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals rejects environmental groups Grand Canyon arguments. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Environmentalists lose court battle" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36751871@N00/431062182"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0px 5px;" title="Colorado River" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/188/431062182_c7d6b73118_m.jpg" border="0" alt="431062182 c7d6b73118 m Environmentalists lose court battle" hspace="5" width="240" height="167" /></a>The 9th U.S Circuit Court of Appeals rejected environmentalist&#8217;s arguments last Wednesday that the National Park Service ignored its own rules and policies governing the Grand Canyon, that say canyon uses shouldn&#8217;t impair the wilderness character of the park.</p>
<p>At issue was the use of motorized water craft on the Colorado River. This was permitted in the 2006 implementation of the Colorado River Management Plan. Needless to say, a victory by the environmental groups would have put a heavy burden on dozens of rafting companies using motorized crafts for their Grand Canyon tours. While I understand the arguments, I believe these craft open the Canyon to thousands of people who would otherwise miss it. Not everyone has two weeks to float the canyon, and the motorized craft provide a much quicker trip.</p>
<p><span id="more-178"></span></p>
<p>A trip through the Grand Canyon on the river is a trip of a lifetime. If you haven&#8217;t done it, you should; it is a life changing experience. It truly makes you realize how small we really are, and how little impact we really have on the life of the planet. I feel that all we are doing that is now damaging Earth will not destroy it, we will simply make it uninhabitable for humans. It has been before, and will be again. <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/environment/Court_upholds_Grand_Canyons_river_management_plan.html" target="_blank">San Antonio News article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/26/environmentalists-lose-court-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navajo Nation embraces &#8220;green jobs&#8221; initiative</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/navajo-nation-embraces-green-jobs-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/navajo-nation-embraces-green-jobs-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native american]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native american issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navajo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navajo nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "greening" of the Navajo Nation. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30628981@N00/3369751442"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0px 5px;" title="Big turkeys" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3425/3369751442_6c61184958_m.jpg" border="0" alt="3369751442 6c61184958 m Navajo Nation embraces green jobs initiative" hspace="5" width="240" height="160" /></a>The Navajo National Council has established the Navajo Green Economy Commission, which will oversee  monies for green job initiatives. These are funds from state, federal, and private sources that will be made available to the public for projects the commission rules are appropriate.</p>
<p>This is great news, and I whole heartedly support this move by the Navajo Nation. It will not only support environmental improvement, but also add much needed jobs to the reservation economy. More projects like this are sorely needed throughtout northern Arizona in order to protect our environment and invigorate our economies. Read more <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2009/07/navajo-indians-green-jobs-.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/navajo-nation-embraces-green-jobs-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPS and FAA discuss Grand Canyon overflights</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/nps-and-faa-discuss-grand-canyon-overflights/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/nps-and-faa-discuss-grand-canyon-overflights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national park service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government to review Grand Canyon overflight noise issues. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to constant complaints about noise disrupting the natural peace that is the Grand Canyon, the National Park Service and the Federal Aviation Administration will hold a meeting July 28, 2009. The meeting will take place from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm at the High Country Conference Center at 300 South Milton Road, Flagstaff, Arizona.</p>
<p>The meeting is open to the public, but attendees will be limited to making brief comments at the end. Have spent 100&#8242;s of hours in the Grand Canyon, I can personally attest to the noise problem. It would seem to make sense, that overflights could be directed to areas of the canyon that are not already congested with tourists, allowing at least some sense of the natural environment undisturbed by planes and helicopters.  More information <a href="http://www.nps.gov/grca/parknews/national-park-service-and-federal-aviation-administration-to-hold-meeting-on-grand-canyon-overflights.htm" target="_blank">here</a>. If you have had an experience with this issue, please leave a comment to open discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/24/nps-and-faa-discuss-grand-canyon-overflights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dept. of Interior stops new mining claims near Grand Canyon</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/20/dept-of-interior-stops-new-mining-claims-near-grand-canyon/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/20/dept-of-interior-stops-new-mining-claims-near-grand-canyon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of the interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national parks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important evironmental announcement for the Grand Canyon. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, announced this morning that the filing of new mining claims on nearly 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon will be temporarily barred. The ban will be in effect for two years while an evironmental study is conducted to determine the consequences of mining near the national park. Tomorrow a congressional hearing will be held on a bill to set aside over 1 million acres north and south of the Grand Canyon.</p>
<p>This is great news for park enthusiasts. The government is stepping up and finally taking action to preserve our environment. There are currently old uranium mining claims near the canyon that have not been cleaned up. This presents a real danger to people, animals, and the environment in general. Read more about the announcement <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32004574/ns/us_news-environment/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/20/dept-of-interior-stops-new-mining-claims-near-grand-canyon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Butte rally against new uranium mining around Grand Canyon</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/17/red-butte-rally-against-new-uranium-mining-around-grand-canyon/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/17/red-butte-rally-against-new-uranium-mining-around-grand-canyon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red butte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A rally against new uranium exploration, mining, and the reopening of old mines in the Grand Canyon area will be held this weekend at Red Butte, just a few miles  south of the south entrance to the park. This mining activity poses a real threat to one of our national treasures. If you are going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rally against new uranium exploration, mining, and the reopening of old mines in the Grand Canyon area will be held this weekend at Red Butte, just a few miles  south of the south entrance to the park. This mining activity poses a real threat to one of our national treasures. If you are going to the Grand Canyon this weekend, stop by and support the rally. Read <a href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2009/grand-canyon-rally-7-17-09.html" target="_blank">more</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/17/red-butte-rally-against-new-uranium-mining-around-grand-canyon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dept. of Interior reverses Bush logging policy</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/16/dept-of-interior-reverses-bush-logging-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/16/dept-of-interior-reverses-bush-logging-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Department of the Interior has reversed a Bush administration logging policy that would have greatly reduced the protected area of the spotted owl. It was determined that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to consult federal biologists before implementing the logging plan.</p> <p>Finally, after eight years of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of the Interior has reversed a Bush administration logging policy that would have greatly reduced the protected area of the spotted owl. It was determined that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to consult federal biologists before implementing the logging plan.</p>
<p>Finally, after eight years of science being derided and federal lands being leased for oil drilling, there is an administration in power that appears ready to protect our environment. This is truly an important time for us to take responsibility for our actions that impact the other inhabitants of this planet. I applaud the Dept. of Interior on its decision. Read more <a href="http://bit.ly/2UuEIj" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/16/dept-of-interior-reverses-bush-logging-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPS proposing the change of boating rules in Grand Canyon</title>
		<link>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/10/nps-proposing-the-change-of-boating-rules-in-grand-canyon/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/10/nps-proposing-the-change-of-boating-rules-in-grand-canyon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national park service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonarockstours.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times is reporting today that the National Park Service will publish in the Federal Register on Monday a proposal changing boating and river camping rules and regulations. The proposal would require all persons using the river within park boundaries to have a permit issued by the Park Superintendent. Currently, the last 51 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times is reporting today that the National Park Service will publish in the <em>Federal Register</em> on Monday a proposal changing boating and river camping rules and regulations. The proposal would require all persons using the river within park boundaries to have a permit issued by the Park Superintendent. Currently, the last 51 miles of the river, from Diamond Creek to the park boundary are open to use without a permit. The proposal will also prohibit camping in the Havasu Creek drainage from the boundary between the park and the Havasupai reservation to the Colorado River. The Times article can be read <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/07/10/10greenwire-nps-to-propose-boat-rule-for-grand-canyon-88740.html" target="_blank">here</a>. Click <a href="http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11674/features/documents/2009/07/10/document_gw_01.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> to read the proposed rule.</p>
<p>This proposal will help contol the use of the river; a much needed extension to cover the entire Grand Canyon National Park. The uncontrolled use of the last 51 miles has led to people disregarding what most persons feel are simply rules of consideration. Trash, human waste, and uncontrolled fires have led to the desecration of this section of river. Over 30,000 people use the Colorado between Lee&#8217;s Ferry and the park&#8217;s western boundary. I&#8217;m all for limiting that use in order to preserve our beautiful natural wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonarockstours.com/2009/07/10/nps-proposing-the-change-of-boating-rules-in-grand-canyon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

